{"id":6570,"date":"2020-05-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-05-27T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www-staging.carta.com\/sg\/carta\/options-vs-rsus\/"},"modified":"2021-03-05T06:54:48","modified_gmt":"2021-03-05T06:54:48","slug":"options-vs-rsus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www-staging.carta.com\/sg\/blog\/options-vs-rsus\/","title":{"rendered":"Switching from options to RSUs"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n
Companies move from issuing employee stock options<\/a> to restricted stock units (RSU<\/a>) as they become larger for at least the following reasons:<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n In a tougher economic climate<\/a>, it may make sense for companies to switch to offering RSUs instead of stock options because, unlike options, RSUs will still be worth something even if the price of the stock goes down. Option grants become \u201cunderwater\u201d if their fair market value falls below the strike price). However, if the 409A valuation<\/a> of the company drops significantly for a temporary time and then rises, it may make options seem like a good deal in comparison to RSUs.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n Generally, later stage companies are the ones that look to switch to RSUs. Early on, options make sense for a company because of the relatively low strike price and higher anticipated growth rate.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n So if you\u2019re a CFO of a mid- to late-stage company, when do you switch? Timing matters. You want to ensure you aren\u2019t late (or early) to the game. This guide is here to help make sure you get this important decision right, because it has deep ramifications for your company and employees.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n RSUs have benefits for both existing and newer employees. Including some major simplifications:\u00a0<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n But RSUs often have a certain type of vesting condition, called triggers<\/strong>, which can be performance <\/strong>or time-based<\/strong>. Most private RSUs have \u201cdouble-triggers,\u201d meaning they only vest after two conditions are met. Time-based triggers are like your standard vesting schedules. But performance-based triggers are tied to company milestones, like going public or undergoing a change in company ownership.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n Here\u2019s a list of the major differences between RSUs and options:<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Options vs RSUs<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
\r\n
\n
\n \n\n Equity<\/th> Value proposition<\/th> Pros<\/th> Cons<\/th><\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n RSUs<\/b><\/td> The value of RSUs is much easier to measure. They\u2019re worth whatever the company stock is worth at the time of issuance. They don\u2019t need to be purchased so there\u2019s less risk. <\/td> RSUs will require less equity burn (from the company) to provide similar value to the candidate.<\/td> Employees have no control over the timing of the taxes or the tax rate (compensatory). Employees might even lose any RSUs they have \u201caccrued\u201d if they leave before both triggers are met.
Results in less alignment between workers and company. Offering RSU liquidity is currently really difficult.<\/td> <\/tr>\n \n Options<\/b><\/td> Provides more upside for those employed at high growth companies. Employees can optimize for taxes in a way they cannot with RSUs.<\/td> Allows employees to have control over the timing of their tax obligation and allows for participation in liquidity programs such as tender offers.<\/td> Results in more equity burn in order to provide similar value to RSUs.
As companies mature, exercise costs become a barrier and the gap between preferred and strike price will fall, reducing inherent value.<\/td> <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n